The market is rising -- money again to pay for more things!!

I've been busy studying the market.. there are so many bargains there! Now is the time to do your research and buy a small number.
I only invest $500.00 in each company.. and that's why I try to buy well at even half a cent..
MHL is cheap and under .05 cents , PDY is on a trading halt and been rising -
QUR has risen 25% today and
ABY - my best one (it pays a dividend) which I bought at 11 cents in March, is now 1.17 and rising steadily. It has a market cap of about 265 million and I expect it to rise back to over $2.00
There are heaps of others.
Go to asx.com.au each day after 4.30 pm. go to prices /market stats/ volume risers. and find the ones in your price range. (best under ten cents) Then go to google finance, type in the code example ASX:ABY and it will come up with todays price, market cap and underneath will show other companies in the same price range and sector. It will show how they are performing. then do more homework. Then count your cents and buy for your future.

Remember we are not financial advisors..
Sampson management Services (SMS) educate and inform only...
We are Assett Management Consultants- we teach you about risk and how to measure that risk according to the international standards on Quality, Environment, OHS, and Risk management in an integrated approach.
Ref standards:
AS/NZS/ISO 9001, AS/NZS/ISO 14001, AS/NZS/ISO 4804, AS/NZS/ISO 4360.

should we invest or not?

The Australian market is rising and it seems that the recovery is on its way, however the American unemployment figures (or Australias) may not be as good as they seem. Therefore the result may not be as rosy as suggested.They may be counting part timers and casuals as "real jobs".
There may be more pain to come. BUT if you buy wisely now, you should make money in the longer term.

I bought ABY for 12 cents in April and now they are about 79 cents. Their price 12 months ago was 2.30.
I also purchased MCW for 17 cents and they are now around 56 cents. NWT is rising and at 7 cents should give a profit in the next 12 months. There are heaps of others. it's just a matter of being able to buy and hold, without using a margin loan. But it might be a rough and scary ride, so don't invest all your eggs in one basket and only buy minimal amounts.
and don't forget..I could be wrong. so do your own homework. make your own decisions. as the great guru,WarrenBuffet says, "eat your own cooking"

Mega

Remember we are not financial advisors..
Sampson management Services (SMS) educate and inform only...We are Assett Management Consultants- we teach you about risk and how to measure that risk according to the international standards on Quality, Environment, OHS, and Risk management in an integrated approach.
Ref standards:
AS/NZS/ISO 9001, AS/NZS/ISO 14001, AS/NZS/ISO 4804, AS/NZS/ISO 4360.

Its july 1st 2009 and we've just been through the worst

2008-2009 has been probably the worst year for the share market (and superannuation funds) since the crash of 1929. Yesterday I was trying to find some shares under ten cents to alert you to..
One was PNO Pharmamet which was selling at .007 which meant you could buy 100,000 shares for about $720.00. Why PNO?- well they have, via their subsidiary company, created and patented
an over the counter arthritis medication and received a US patent on the 3.4.09.
I think it will bring good returns.

Remember we are not financial advisors..
Sampson management Services (SMS) educate and inform only...We are Asset Management Consultants- we teach you about risk and how to measure that risk according to the international standards on Quality, Environment, OHS, and Risk management in an integrated approach.
Ref standards:
AS/NZS/ISO 9001, AS/NZS/ISO 14001, AS/NZS/ISO 4804, AS/NZS/ISO 4360.

Tip MACQUARIE COUNTRYWIDE TRUST (MCW)

todays free tip
MACQUARIE COUNTRYWIDE TRUST (MCW) is up. it was 13.5 cents on 9.3.09 and on the 15.3.09 had risen to 17.5 cents
Makes sense really.
Interest rates are down, the market seems to have bottomed, (I predicted the bottom as 19.2.09) so property is sure to rise.

if you think of the sharemarket cycle, as a circle. Then we are at the top of the circle, about to move back down the right side to a new bull market. Probably driven by property.
if you can't afford real property, then buy some property shares.
This is cheap.
The recovery could happen quickly, or may take a few months.

I think by next Xmas, we'll see a good sharemarket rise.

Mega
Disclaimer: I/we do not own any of these.. yet



Remember we are not financial advisors..
Sampson management Services (SMS) educate and inform only...We are Assett Management Consultants-
we teach you about risk and how to measure that risk according to the international standards on Quality, Environment, OHS, and Risk management in an integrated approach.
Ref standards: AS/NZS/ISO 9001, AS/NZS/ISO 14001, AS/NZS/ISO 4804, AS/NZS/ISO 4360.

The tide has turned.. the bear is not growling!

Mega at Megamoneybox thinks the tide has turned and the recovery is on the way.
other writers say that when the recovery starts, the highest growth will be in the first 100 days, so start doing your homework.. NOW
check back to see if she was right today 19.02.2009.


Remember we are not financial advisors..
Sampson management Services (SMS) educate and inform only...We are Assett Management Consultants- we teach you about risk and how to measure that risk according to the international standards on Quality, Environment, OHS, and Risk management in an integrated approach.
Ref standards:
AS/NZS/ISO 9001, AS/NZS/ISO 14001, AS/NZS/ISO 4804, AS/NZS/ISO 4360.

free aussie stock tip by Megamoneybox

Free Aussie stock tips by Megamoneybox

Aby.ax (ADITYA FPO [ABY]) was as high as $3.00 last year, and I made 17.4% profit on sale of stock. After the stock crash it dropped to just 11 cents, then rose to 16 and now 14 cents.
This company mines copper and paid a dividend last year of 10 cents, when it was at 2.34.
I made 5 cents profit a share this week, and I am confident it will come back to at least a dollar. Check it out on the www.asx.com.au and read the announcements.

FMS- was flinders diamonds.. rising too. Check it's history on asx.

FMG Fortesque metals went down to 1.61 , but now around 2.47. Was up around $8.00 last year..

This is a time of opportunity for those who aren't greedy, and who do not risk more than they can afford to lose. DON'T BORROW TO INVEST. DON'T USE A MARGIN LOAN.

Remember we are not financial advisors..
Sampson management Services (SMS) educate and inform only...
We are Asset Management Consultants- we teach you about risk and how to measure that risk according to the international standards on Quality, Environment, OHS, and Risk management in an integrated approach. Ref standards:
AS/NZS/ISO 9001, AS/NZS/ISO 14001, AS/NZS/ISO 4804, AS/NZS/ISO 4360.

Fw: A Better Way to Bailout Banks

Here something to think about. 

Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 8:00 AM

Subject: A Better Way to Bailout Banks

Dear Colleagues:

I thought you would be interested in reading my latest essay published in the Financial Times. I critique the way it appears the government intends to spend the second tranche of TARP funding and propose an alternative.

George Soros

The Right and Wrong Way to Bail Out the Banks
By George Soros

According to reports in Washington, the Obama administration may be close to devoting as much as $100bn of the second tranche of the troubled asset relief programme funds to creating an "aggregator bank" that would remove toxic securities from the balance sheets of banks. The plan would be to leverage this amount up 10-fold, using the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, so that the banking system could be relieved of up to $1,000bn (€770bn, £726bn) worth of bad assets.

Although the details have not yet been decided, this approach harks back to the approach originally taken - but eventually abandoned - by Hank Paulson, the former US Treasury secretary. The proposal suffers from the same shortcomings: the toxic securities are, by definition, hard to value. The introduction of a significant buyer will result, not in price discovery, but in price distortion.

Moreover, the securities are not homogeneous, which means that even an auction process would leave the aggregator bank with inferior assets through adverse selection. Even with artificially inflated prices, most banks could not afford to mark their remaining portfolios to market so they would have to be given some additional relief. The most likely solution is to "ring-fence" their portfolios, with the Federal Reserve absorbing losses that extend beyond certain limits.

These measures - if enacted - would provide artificial life support for the banks at considerable expense to the taxpayer, but would not put the banks in a position to resume lending at competitive rates. The banks would need fat margins and steep yield curves for a long time to rebuild their equity.

In my view, an equity injection scheme based on realistic valuations, followed by a cut in minimum capital requirements for banks, would be much more effective in restarting the economy. The downside is that it would require significantly more than $1,000bn of new capital. It would involve a good bank/bad bank solution, where appropriate. That would heavily dilute existing shareholders and risk putting the majority of bank equity into government hands.

The hard choice facing the Obama administration is between partially nationalising the banks, or leaving them in private hands but nationalising their toxic assets. Choosing the first course would inflict great pain on a broad segment of the population - not only on bank shareholders but also on the beneficiaries of pension funds. However, it would clear the air and restart the economy.

The latter course would avoid recognising and coming to terms with the painful economic realities, but it would put the banking system into the same quandary that proved the undoing of the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) - Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The public interest would dictate that the banks should resume lending on attractive terms. However, this lending would have to be enforced by government diktat because the self-interest of the banks would lead them to focus on preserving and rebuilding their own equity.

Political realities are pushing the Obama administration towards the latter course. It cannot go to Congress and ask for the authorisation to spend an additional $1,000bn on recapitalising the banks because Mr Paulson has poisoned the well in the way he demanded and then spent the money for Tarp. Even the second tranche of Tarp - the remaining $350bn - could only be pried loose by a congressional manoeuvre. That is what is leading the Obama administration to contemplate reserving up to $100bn of that tranche for the "aggregator bank" solution.

The stock market is pressing for an early decision by putting pressure on financial stocks. But the new team should avoid repeating the mistakes of the previous one and announcing a programme before it has been thoroughly thought out. The choice between the two courses is momentous; once made, it will become irreversible. It should be based on a careful evaluation of the alternatives.

President Barack Obama can fulfil his promise of a bold new approach only by establishing a discontinuity with the previous team. Congress and the public are right in feeling that too much has been done for the banks and not enough for beleaguered householders. The government ought to take the GSEs out of limbo and use them more actively to stabilise the housing market. Having done so, it could go back to Congress for authorisation to recapitalise the banking system the right way.

The writer is chairman of Soros Fund Management

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009

Click here to read the entire article.

More articles and essays by George Soros can be found at www.georgesoros.com